Mike.ai

Completion-readiness fit check

Decide if the Scottish conveyancing wedge is worth piloting.

Use non-confidential operating assumptions to test whether Mike.ai should move to a pending workspace request, source-map call and 60-day metadata-only pilot.

Public fit check only. Do not enter client names, matter references, document text or confidential instructions.

Default score

75/100

Estimated value

GBP 3,962

Data boundary

No private matter data

Operating assumptions

Use rough team-level figures only. Do not enter client names, matter references, document text or confidential instructions.

Fit result

75/100

Good fit if reviewer ownership and source conventions are clear.

Proceed if the supervising partner accepts export locks and the team can supply redacted or metadata-only evidence.

good fit

Hours/month

41.7h

Value/month

£3,962

Matter limit use

60%

Risk signals

  • High-risk blockers are frequent enough to make export locks and partner review visible.
  • Matter status is likely fragmented across multiple evidence gaps.
  • Manual chasing effort is material enough to test saved-time value.

Required gates

  • Use fictional, redacted or metadata-only evidence for the first evaluation.
  • Nominate a partner or risk owner for high-risk review rows and export locks.
  • Keep private document body storage disabled until Access, retention, deletion and audit gates pass.
  • Map the SharePoint/OneDrive matter-folder convention before any Microsoft Graph consent request.

Next actions

  1. 1Create a pending company workspace request without private matter details.
  2. 2Run a 30-minute source-map call covering AML/source-of-funds, RoS, LBTT/ADS, lender, insurance and completion statement evidence.
  3. 3Agree the reviewer route and export-lock policy before any private data activation.
  4. 4Use the pilot to compare existing reporting against Mike.ai blocker and ROI readbacks.