Completion-readiness fit check
Decide if Scottish conveyancing completion readiness is worth operationalising.
Use non-confidential operating assumptions to test whether Mike.ai should move to a workspace access request, a controlled product demo, assurance review and self-service Starter 5 workspace.
Public fit check only. Do not enter client names, matter references, document text or confidential instructions.
Default score
75/100
Estimated value
GBP 3,962
Data boundary
No private matter data
Operating assumptions
Use rough team-level figures only. Do not enter client names, matter references, document text or confidential instructions.
Fit result
75/100
Good fit if reviewer ownership and source conventions are clear.
Proceed if the supervising partner accepts export locks and the team can supply redacted or controlled evidence.
Hours/month
41.7h
Value/month
£3,962
Matter limit use
60%
Risk signals
- High-risk blockers are frequent enough to make export locks and partner review visible.
- Matter status is likely fragmented across multiple evidence gaps.
- Manual chasing effort is material enough to test saved-time value.
Required gates
- Use fictional, redacted or controlled evidence for the first evaluation.
- Nominate a partner or risk owner for high-risk review rows and export locks.
- Keep private document body storage disabled until Access, retention, deletion and audit gates pass.
- Map the SharePoint/OneDrive matter-folder convention before any Microsoft Graph consent request.
Next actions
- 1Request workspace access without private matter details.
- 2Run a 30-minute source-map call covering AML/source-of-funds, RoS, LBTT/ADS, lender, insurance and completion statement evidence.
- 3Agree the reviewer route and export-lock policy before any private data activation.
- 4Use the workflow to compare existing reporting against Mike.ai blocker and ROI readbacks.